(Membandingkan Teks Diskusi vs. Teks Argumentatif)
At first glance, discussion texts and argumentative texts may look similar because both deal with issues, opinions, and reasoning. However, their purpose, structure, and language use clearly distinguish them. Understanding these differences helps students read critically and write more effectively.
Sepintas, teks diskusi dan teks argumentatif mungkin terlihat mirip karena keduanya membahas isu, opini, dan penalaran. Namun, tujuan, struktur, dan penggunaan bahasanya membedakan keduanya dengan jelas. Memahami perbedaan ini membantu siswa membaca secara kritis dan menulis dengan lebih efektif.
1. 🔎 Focus and Purpose (Fokus dan Tujuan)
A. Discussion Text (Teks Diskusi)
A discussion text aims to present multiple viewpoints on an issue in a fair and balanced way. The writer does not try to influence the reader but provides information so readers can form their own opinion.
(Teks diskusi bertujuan untuk menyajikan berbagai sudut pandang mengenai suatu isu secara adil dan seimbang. Penulis tidak mencoba memengaruhi pembaca, melainkan memberikan informasi agar pembaca dapat membentuk opini mereka sendiri.)
Key purposes (Tujuan utama):
- To explore an issue from different perspectives
(Mengeksplorasi isu dari berbagai perspektif). - To show both advantages and disadvantages
(Menunjukkan keuntungan dan kerugian). - To remain neutral and objective
(Tetap netral dan objektif).
- To explore an issue from different perspectives
Example topic (Topic Contoh):
Should students wear school uniforms?
(Haruskah siswa mengenakan seragam sekolah?)
B. Argumentative Text (Teks Argumentatif)
An argumentative text, on the other hand, is written to persuade. The writer clearly states a position and supports it with strong arguments, evidence, and reasoning to convince the reader.
(Teks argumentatif, di sisi lain, ditulis untuk membujuk. Penulis menyatakan posisi secara jelas dan mendukungnya dengan argumen, bukti, dan penalaran yang kuat untuk meyakinkan pembaca.)
Key purposes (Tujuan utama):
- To defend one clear point of view
(Membela satu sudut pandang yang jelas). - To influence readers’ opinions or actions (Memengaruhi opini atau tindakan pembaca).
- To prove that one position is stronger than the others
(Membuktikan bahwa satu posisi lebih kuat dari yang lain).
- To defend one clear point of view
Example topic (Topic Contoh):
Why students should wear school uniforms
(Mengapa siswa harus mengenakan seragam sekolah).
2. 🏗️ Text Structure (Struktur Teks)
| Discussion Text Structure | Argumentative Text Structure |
|---|---|
| Introduction: Introduces the issue and its importance. (Mengenalkan isu dan pentingnya.) | Introduction: Introduces the issue and clearly states the writer’s position. (Mengenalkan isu dan posisi penulis.) |
| Arguments For: Supporting evidence. (Argumen pendukung/Pro) | Body Paragraphs: Present arguments, facts, and expert opinions. (Menyajikan argumen, fakta, dan opini ahli.) |
| Arguments Against: Opposing evidence. (Argumen penentang/Kontra) | Refutation: Weakening opposing arguments. (Sanggahan terhadap argumen lawan.) |
| Conclusion: Summarizes both sides; remains neutral. (Ringkasan kedua sisi; bersifat netral) | Conclusion: Restates position with a call to action. (Menyatakan kembali posisi dengan ajakan bertindak) |
3. 🔊Language Features (Ciri Kebahasaan)
A. Discussion Text Language Features:
- Neutral and factual language (Bahasa netral dan faktual).
- Modal verbs for possibility: could, might, may, should (Kata kerja modal untuk kemungkinan).
- Balanced connectors: on the other hand, however, furthermore, in contrast (Kata penghubung seimbang).
- Example: School uniforms might help improve discipline; however, they could also limit students’ self-expression.
B. Argumentative Text Language Features:
- Persuasive and emotive language (Bahasa persuasif dan emotif).
- Strong modal verbs: must, need to, have to (Kata kerja modal yang kuat).
- Logical and causal connectors: therefore, because, as a result, consequently (Kata penghubung sebab-akibat).
- Example: Students must wear uniforms because they create equality and improve discipline.
4. 🗝️ Key Example Comparison (Perbandingan Contoh)
A. Discussion Text: "Should Schools Ban Junk Food?"
- Intro: Introduces the junk food debate. (Mengenalkan debat junk food).
- For: Improves students’ health. (Meningkatkan kesehatan siswa)
- Against: Students lose choice; canteens suffer. (Siswa kehilangan pilihan; kantin merugi).
- Conclusion: Suggests moderation. (Menyarankan moderasi/jalan tengah)
B. Argumentative Text: "Why Schools Must Ban Junk Food"
- Intro: States belief that a ban is necessary. (Menyatakan keyakinan bahwa larangan itu perlu).
- Body: Explains health risks and counters "choice" arguments. (Menjelaskan risiko kesehatan dan menyanggah argumen "pilihan bebas").
- Conclusion: Urges immediate implementation (Mendesak penerapan segera).
📋 Short Conclusion (Ringkasan Singkat)
- A. Discussion Text = Balanced exploration of an issue (Eksplorasi masalah yang seimbang)
- B. Argumentative Text = Persuasive defense of one position (Pembelaan persuasif pada satu posisi).
5. 📝 Interactive Exercise
Quick Quiz: Discussion vs. Argumentative
Test your understanding! (Uji pemahamanmu!)
- What is the primary goal of a Discussion Text?
(Apa tujuan utama dari Teks Diskusi?) - Which structural element is unique to an Argumentative Text?
(Elemen struktur mana yang khas ada pada Teks Argumentatif?) - Which phrase is a "balanced connector" typical of a Discussion Text?
(Frasa mana yang merupakan penghubung seimbang khas Teks Diskusi?) - Argumentative texts use strong modal verbs like...
(Teks argumentatif menggunakan kata kerja modal yang kuat seperti...) - Which title best represents an Argumentative Text?
(Judul mana yang paling mewakili Teks Argumentatif?)
© Educational Content - Discussion vs Argumentative Text
